This key thinker argues the market system of exchange was to be abolished and replaced by exchange based on the true value of labour and goods:
-In his early life his ideas were close to those of Marx - he opposed capitalism and the existence of private property, seeing them both as oppressive.
-Furthermore, he agreed with the Marxists that the state was the agent of capitalism - therefore both capitalism and the state had to be abolished.
-He saw the 1871 Paris Commune as an anarchist revolt, aiming to replace the oppressive state with a commune where there was to be common ownership of property, economic equality and direct democracy in place of political rule.
-His visions of an ordered society, based on the laws of nature, were known as federalism.
-He saw groups of workers or peasants joining together (spontaneously) in voluntary communities of any size.
-As long as people group themselves in such communes, with common ownership of property and equal distribution of rewards on a voluntary basis, there is no coercion.
-The relationships between these communes or federations were to be conducted on the basis of mutual benefit.
-There was to be no capitalist market system, which would promote inequality, but rather a system of free negotiation and exchange on the basis of the true value of goods and services.
-He saw no contradiction between economic freedom and collective ownership.