Rosenhan Study - Statistics

General Stats
  • This quiz has been taken 6 times
  • The average score is 9 of 46
Answer Stats
Hint Answer % Correct
How many patients were rated as pseudo-patients by a psychiatrist and another member of staff? 19
67%
What was the average stay in the hospital? 19 days
67%
How many American states where the admission offices were located did they call? 5 states
67%
What was the title of his study? On being sane in insane places
67%
What is the Clinical Psychology Classic Study? Rosenhan (1973)
67%
What were 7 of them diagnosed with? Schizophrenia in remission
67%
What % of nurses stopped and talked? 0.5%
33%
What % of faculty members stopped and talked? 100%
33%
How many psychiatrists responded to the pseudo-patients? 13
33%
How many attempts did the student make to contact faculty? 14
33%
How many faculty members responded to the student? 14
33%
How many patients were rated as pseudo-patients by at least one psychiatrist? 23
33%
What time span was given to the teaching and psychiatric hospital that 1 or more pseudo-patients would try to get admitted? 3 months
33%
How many hospitals did this study occur in? 4
33%
What % of psychiatrists stopped and talked? 4%
33%
What was the shortest stay? 7 days
33%
What were the voices saying? 'Empty', 'Thud' and 'Hollow'
33%
What was the anomole diagnosed with? Manic depression with psychosis
33%
How many pseudo-patients were admitted? No pseudo-patients were admitted
33%
How did they behave once inside? Normally
33%
How many attempts did the pseudo-patients make to contact nurses? 1283
0%
How many attempts did the pseudo-patients make to contact psychiatrists? 185
0%
How many patients were assessed in the 3 months? 193
0%
How many patients were rated as pseudo-patients by at least two members of staff? 41
0%
How many nurses responded to the pseudo-patients? 47
0%
What was the longest stay? 52 days (Rosenhan)
0%
How many pseudopatients were there? 8, including Rosenhan. 5 men and 3 women with no mental health problems
0%
What were the responses compared to? A student at Stanford University when she asked staff for help, such as how to find an area of campus
0%
Applications? Criteria for diagnosis increases and highlighted the danger of labelling
0%
Generalisability? Good as it looked at old and new hospitals, as well as well-staffed and under-staffed hospitals. However, you can't generalise across other cultures
0%
What did Rosenhan suggest? He suggested that patients are powerless and the lack of eye contact depersonalises the patients.
0%
Ethics? High confidentiality. Lack of informed consent, no right to withdraw and deception
0%
Ecological Validity? High ecological validity as tasks have high mundane realism.
0%
What did each member of staff rate on a scale? How likely that the pseudo-patients would be admitted
0%
Internal Validity? Lack of controls and participant observation may mean that it was difficult to record all behaviours
0%
Issues and Debates Medication can lead to social control, Socially sensitive research as hospital staff were undermined, DSM and ICD are constantly updated showing change over time
0%
Who recognised they were faking it? Other mentally troubled patients
0%
What did the pseudo-patients say? Pardon me, Mr/Mrs/Dr X, could you tell me when I will be eligible for ground privileges?
0%
Reliability? Questions and symptoms were standardised however it was a field experiment and conversations with hospital staff couldn't be standardised
0%
What did Rosenhan conclude? Rosenhan concluded that psychiatric patients were treated differently.
0%
What did a follow up test conclude? That there is unreliability in the diagnosis process
0%
What was the conclusion? The label given during diagnosis and then acted on within the institutions
0%
What was the conclusion to the study? The staff were unable to detect insanity
0%
Why did Rosenhan carry out his third study? To investigate how staff interacted with psychiatric patients, and compare this to non-psychiatric patients
0%
What was the aim? To see if psychiatrists could differentiate between sane and insane people
0%
What was the aim of Rosenhan study 2? To see if the hospitals, who had been told they would have pseudo-patients, would be able to identify the sane from the insane
0%
No matching quizzes found
Score Distribution
Percent of People with Each Score
Percentile by Number Answered
Your Score History
You have not taken this quiz