I think Greater Manchester is technically counted as its own county now. But a lot of people I speak to would put down the old county name on their address, and it still seems to be valid, so I don't know. My part of Manchester is (or used to be) in Cheshire anyway.
The counties of England are unchanged for over 1,000 years, so Manchester will always be in Lancashire.
What has changed is governmental administrative areas, which loosely align with the county bounderies and this has caused the confusion.
It is commonly seen with London boroughs that are unitary authorities under the Greater London council, but each area remains within it historic county - Essex, Herfordshire, Surrey, etc.
For London especially, it was expanded in 1935 (I think) and postcodes were first issued around 1948, so those areas referred themselves as London.
However, when it expanded again in 1965, there was resistance to being considered London, so Chislehurst in Bexley continued to use Kent in its address.
The Post Office did not care as long as the postcode or local sorting office was included (Bromley), so people are free to continue to use their county in their address. Even Greenwich, which is famously in London, can call itself Kent correctly.
Respectfully, the first part of your comment is nonsense!
The counties of England have changed many times in the past millennium, Lancashire maybe most of all -- it wasn't even created until the 12th century.
The confusion seems to arise over the difference between the historic and ceremonial counties, the latter being created in the 1970s to streamline local governance.
Greater Manchester absolutely does exist and is a county, it's simply ceremonial rather than historic.
Manchester may have been called the birthplace of the industrial revolution, in the same way that King Arthur may have been called the first man on the moon. Manchester emphatically was not the birthplace of the industrial revolution. Take your pick of the Derwent Valley or Ironbridge Gorge. Even Birmingham has a far better claim to be the birthplace than Manchester.
Nice one!
What has changed is governmental administrative areas, which loosely align with the county bounderies and this has caused the confusion.
It is commonly seen with London boroughs that are unitary authorities under the Greater London council, but each area remains within it historic county - Essex, Herfordshire, Surrey, etc.
For London especially, it was expanded in 1935 (I think) and postcodes were first issued around 1948, so those areas referred themselves as London.
However, when it expanded again in 1965, there was resistance to being considered London, so Chislehurst in Bexley continued to use Kent in its address.
The Post Office did not care as long as the postcode or local sorting office was included (Bromley), so people are free to continue to use their county in their address. Even Greenwich, which is famously in London, can call itself Kent correctly.
The counties of England have changed many times in the past millennium, Lancashire maybe most of all -- it wasn't even created until the 12th century.
The confusion seems to arise over the difference between the historic and ceremonial counties, the latter being created in the 1970s to streamline local governance.
Greater Manchester absolutely does exist and is a county, it's simply ceremonial rather than historic.
Rutherford however was known to split atoms, although he definitely wasn't the first to do so