Congratulations! You are the one millionth user to correct a mistake in this quiz series, please click on this link to see your prize: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ&t
I don't know whether to feel really smart that I got 100% with plenty of time to spare OR whether I'm really dumb because I knew all the "right" answers.
Hah this is the first one of these where during the quiz I forgot the quiz theme for a few questions haha. Was because I had no idea of the answer anyway, the prison and muslim question. And actually sort of the opposite of some others here, the Shakespeare question was what snapped me back into reality. (though with the few before I was like, really?? but shrugged it off and continued.)
And I knew earwigs don't go anywhere near ears (have had em in my pants though, it hurts like hell when they get you, and are rather trigger happy, they only slightly need to be in a pinch, haha (that one wasnt planned, wonder if the term is related) Have had that happen several times! I think most of the times was when I was sitting on a loungebed or outside couch, they were hiding in the nooks and crannies, the folds of fabric or metal hollow joints.They are assholes haha.
I sort of read that one as where people think it comes from.
And I always wonder about the stats on these quizes. Are percentages higher on some questions because people are good at knowing the wrong answers, or bad at knowing the right ones..
You cant see in the stats who were fooled or not ! Unfortunately. (per question, some might be fooled by all, others perhaps float in and out of reality? haha)
I didn't know the insect- and the Shakespeare-question, because I'm not that good in English. I'm Austrian (hint: no Kangaroos, but Sound of Music!), and therefore I didn't know the prison-answer either. All of them are quite low - probably for the same reason.
I wonder if it would be beneficial to include an explanation of wrong answers like the multiple choice quizzes often do, or if that would only prevent the fun comments...
1999 was the last year of the 20th century. If you think that it's 2000, this is discounting the year '0'. We don't Start counting at '1', we start counting at '0'. We say '1' when we've completed one - whether that one is having just completed naming a number, a month, a year or a century.
Everything from 0 - 1 is the first year, 1-2 the second year and so on. 1999 - the time between the start of 1999 and midnight 1999/2000 is the 2000th year, the last year of the 20th century.
To labor the point if I ask you for One million dollars and you only give me $900,000 you haven't given me nothing!
Wasn't an April 1st thing. I was raised that all April Fool's day jokes have to stop before midday anyway.
I genuinely didn't know that there was no year zero. I'd never heard this before, just the pronouncement that we had to add an extra year with no explanation.
There was no Year 0. To state it simply, December 31, 1 B.C. (or B.C.E.) turned into January 1, 1 A.D. (or C.E.).
January thru December of 1 A.D. was the entirety of the Year 1, A.D. and was the first year of the new millennium. The Year 2, A.D. was the 2nd year of the millennium. To complete a millennium, you need 1,000 years, so December 31 of the Year 1000 A.D. completed the first millennium.
January 1, 1001 A.D. began the 2nd millenium. December 31, 2000 A.D. completed the second millennium.
January 1, 2001 was the first day of the third millennium.
This, of course, does not take into account time travel or the desert menu at Ruth's Chris Steak House. (I highly recommend the Sahara Sorbet)
To which I'll submit the argument that, sure, the numerical parity is nice and all, but nobody's really going to care if one century is an eensy bit shorter than the rest. The calendar's already screwed up enough by having no Year Zero.
And there is no definitive way to determine who had the largest inaugural parade. The best indicator of the size of the crowd is Metro ridership numbers. Those numbers indicate that Obama's and GW Bush's crowds were much larger. But I digress.
I find this question a bit dodgy because it gives off a pro-gun stance.
I mean, great, cental America has more gun deaths per capita than the USA, well done. But the USA still has a massive problem (2nd highest gun deaths WW) and the highest gun-related suicides per capita. So why are we writing a snarky quiz question about a tragic ignorance by American lawmakers?
American citizens own something like 400m guns, and they've historically been quite peaceful. There's been a failure to convey that half of murders in the USA are committed by black Americans - and things aren't going to improve until that's shared and corrected with the help of black families who choose excellence over violence. I don't have the stats for hispanics, for some reason they frequently get lumped in with whites
But U.S. President Donald Trump and Former White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer claimed it to be so. Also, you wouldn't dispute the fact the pandas are large raccoons, would you?
Juneau is the capital of Alaska, the panda was inaccurately thought to be a member of the racoon family but it's actually a bear, the earwig is not so called because it crawls into human ears, Pluto is not a planet, and the Soviet union definitely needed money. Wait, is the fact that the answers are wrong the point of this quiz?
Maybe this series needs some revision at some point. The question about the largest country in Central America appears twice and the lightbulb one has different wording in this one, but also appeared before.
(etc)
Cunningham's Law
And I knew earwigs don't go anywhere near ears (have had em in my pants though, it hurts like hell when they get you, and are rather trigger happy, they only slightly need to be in a pinch, haha (that one wasnt planned, wonder if the term is related) Have had that happen several times! I think most of the times was when I was sitting on a loungebed or outside couch, they were hiding in the nooks and crannies, the folds of fabric or metal hollow joints.They are assholes haha.
I sort of read that one as where people think it comes from.
You cant see in the stats who were fooled or not ! Unfortunately. (per question, some might be fooled by all, others perhaps float in and out of reality? haha)
Tacometer <-- drag mouse over to show answer
Everything from 0 - 1 is the first year, 1-2 the second year and so on. 1999 - the time between the start of 1999 and midnight 1999/2000 is the 2000th year, the last year of the 20th century.
To labor the point if I ask you for One million dollars and you only give me $900,000 you haven't given me nothing!
I genuinely didn't know that there was no year zero. I'd never heard this before, just the pronouncement that we had to add an extra year with no explanation.
Happy to be corrected and learn :)
January thru December of 1 A.D. was the entirety of the Year 1, A.D. and was the first year of the new millennium. The Year 2, A.D. was the 2nd year of the millennium. To complete a millennium, you need 1,000 years, so December 31 of the Year 1000 A.D. completed the first millennium.
January 1, 1001 A.D. began the 2nd millenium. December 31, 2000 A.D. completed the second millennium.
January 1, 2001 was the first day of the third millennium.
This, of course, does not take into account time travel or the desert menu at Ruth's Chris Steak House. (I highly recommend the Sahara Sorbet)
Thanks for the correction and explanation!
Interesting to know.
When I had had people tell me this previously they'd never explained why - or likely knew - so I'd just presumed they didn't know how counting worked!
Despite this being the internet, I'm happy to be corrected.
Cheers
Always the best day of the year on JetPunk, the hippest place to go when you can't go anywhere! Happy social-distancing & self-quarantining, everyone!
1. El Salvador
2. Venezuela
3. Guatemala
4. Colombia
5. Brazil
6. Bahamas
7. Honduras
8. U.S. Virgin Islands
9. Puerto Rico
10. Mexico
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/gun-deaths-by-country
I mean, great, cental America has more gun deaths per capita than the USA, well done. But the USA still has a massive problem (2nd highest gun deaths WW) and the highest gun-related suicides per capita. So why are we writing a snarky quiz question about a tragic ignorance by American lawmakers?